Skip to main content
Physicists are about to test a hypothesis that could rewrite the textbooks

 Forget everything you think you know about protons.



An international team of physicists is about to test a "sacrilegious" hypothesis about protons - one of the basic building blocks of the Universe - and the results could force a literal rewrite of nuclear physics textbooks.
The experiments, which are now underway in the US, aim to demonstrate that the structure of protons can change inside the nucleus of an atom under certain conditions. If that's found to be the case, a whole lot of experiments are going to have to be reassessed.
"For many scientists, the idea that the internal structure of protons might change under certain circumstances can seem absurd, even sacrilegious," said one of the researchers, Anthony Thomas, from the University of Adelaide in Australia.
"To others like myself, evidence of this internal change is highly sought after and would help to explain some of the inconsistencies in theoretical physics."
So what exactly would it mean if protons do change their structure? Well for our daily lives, not a whole lot. But it would have big implications in the fields of nuclear and theoretical physics. To understand why, you first need to understand what protons are made of.
While they're one of the smallest building blocks, protons are actually made of smaller particles, known as quarks, which are held together by gluons.
Our current understanding is that the protons inside the nuclei of atoms have the exact same structure as free protons.
But that assumption doesn't quite fit with quantum chromodynamics, the theory that describes the interactions between quarks and gluons. Based on that, the protons inside an atom's nuclei should theoretically undergo changes under certain energy levels.
Up until now, it was pretty much impossible to test whether or not this was the case. But thanks to new equipment at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility in Virginia, that's about to change.
"By firing a beam of electrons at an atomic nucleus you can measure the difference in energy of the outgoing electrons, representing the changed state,"said Thomas. "We are making some fairly strong predictions about what the outcomes of those tests will show, and we're hopeful of a definitive measurement."
In preparation for the first experiments, Thomas and his team have published their predictions in Physical Review Letters (full version at ArXiv), so that they're on the record.
Whether they're right or wrong, the results will be a huge deal for our understanding of some of the most crucial building blocks in the Universe, and will hopefully lead to a better understanding of the physics that drives the interactions of everything around us.
"The ramifications for the scientific world are significant," said Thomas. "This is about as high stakes as it gets in science. It could represent a new paradigm for nuclear physics."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Einstein’s Lost Theory Describes a Universe Without a Big Bang

Einstein with Edwin Hubble, in 1931, at the Mount Wilson Observatory in California, looking through the lens of the 100-inch telescope through which Hubble discovered the expansion of the universe in 1929.  Courtesy of the Archives, Calif Inst of Technology. In 1917, a year after Albert Einstein’s  general theory of relativity  was published—but still two years before he would become the international celebrity we know—Einstein chose to tackle the  entire universe . For anyone else, this might seem an exceedingly ambitious task—but this was Einstein. Einstein began by applying his  field equations of gravitation  to what he considered to be the entire universe. The field equations were the mathematical essence of his general theory of relativity, which extended Newton’s theory of gravity  to realms where speeds approach that of light and masses are very large. But his math was better than he wanted to believe—...
Post a Comment
Read more

There’s a Previously Undiscovered Organ in Your Body, And It Could Explain How Cancer Spreads

Ever heard of the interstitium? No? That’s OK, you’re not alone  —  scientists hadn’t either. Until recently. And, hey, guess what  —  you’ve got one! The interstitium is your newest organ. Scientists identified it for the first time because they are better able to observe living tissues at a microscopic scale, according to a recent study published  in  Scientific Reports , Scientists had long believed that connective tissue surrounding our organs was a thick, compact layer. That’s what they saw when they looked at it in the lab, outside the body, at least. But in a routine endoscopy (exploration of the gastrointestinal tract), a micro camera revealed something unexpected: When observed in a living body, the connective tissue turned out to be “an open, fluid-filled space supported by a lattice made of thick collagen bundles,” pathologist and study author Neil Theise  told  Research Gate . This network of channels is present throughout ...
Post a Comment
Read more

First light-bending calculator designed with metamaterials

Exotic materials that bend light in extreme ways could be used to perform complex mathematical operations, creating a new kind of analogue computer. Tools for manipulating light waves have taken off in recent years thanks to the development of  metamaterials . These materials have complex internal structures on scales smaller than the wavelength of the light they interact with, and so they produce unusual effects. Most famously, metamaterials promise to deliver " invisibility cloaks " that can route light around an object, making it seem to disappear. Nader Engheta  at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and his colleagues decided to explore a different use for metamaterials, one that adapts the  old idea of analogue computing . Today's digital computers are based on electrical switches that are either on or off. But before these machines were analogue computers based on varying electrical or mechanical properties. The  slide rule  is one example...
Post a Comment
Read more